Project #51913 - 20 Slide Power Point (KM Report on Walmart)

In this individual project, you will function in the capacity of Chief Knowledge Officer or consultant to an organization, either accessible or researched.


Required Elements to include in the Project Presentation:

  • The presentation should include a statement of your objective as the CKO or consultant and the strategic alignment of KM to the organization’s mission.
  • Students will assess the organization’s KM strategies, structures, positions, and processes through a SWOT analysis.
  • Students will make recommendations based on course materials regarding KM strategies to improve the organization.


Required Formatting of Paper:

  • The deliverable for the project is a PowerPoint presentation of 12 to 15 content slides.
  • Include only short bullet points on the slides.
  • Talking points go below each slide (in "click here to add notes"). Talking points should include your K-SWOT, strategic alignment, recommendations and source/references to support these recommendations. A slide for evaluation or K-valuation or Benchmarking metrics is appropriate.
  • Note:  A draft of your  project will be posted for purposes of feedback and K-sharing in the discussion area. You will be required to respond to all questions and comments in the Week 8 discussion area.
  • The level of expected interaction is included in the project grade.

Rubric Name: - PowerPoint Presentation (30%)


demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material

a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist

presentation flows well and logically; transitions are smooth, interesting and enhance presentation

presentation flows well; smooth transitions used on most slides

presentation flows well; smooth transitions used on some slides

presentation is unorganized; very few transitions and/or they distract from presentation

presentation has no flow; no transitions used

demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

failed to show a firm understanding of requirement; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues

largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure

no APA style errors

attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present

attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document

attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other

no attempt at APA style

Overall Score

Subject Business
Due By (Pacific Time) 12/14/2014 06:00 pm
Report DMCA

Chat Now!

out of 1971 reviews

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews

Chat Now!

out of 1164 reviews

Chat Now!

out of 721 reviews

Chat Now!

out of 1600 reviews

Chat Now!

out of 770 reviews

Chat Now!

out of 766 reviews

Chat Now!

out of 680 reviews
All Rights Reserved. Copyright by - Copyright Policy